Sunwoo Hyun: Hobbes's Leviathan

Thomas Hobbes' political philosophy has been given a distorted interpretation and unfair evaluation. The author Sun-hyun, rather than reading the lybian quid in a traditional and orthodox interpretation, tried to re-interpret the quibbled version of the englisher and more socially innovative political philosophy system. Hopps's ideas have been dominated by anti-democracy and far-frequency philosophy which advocates the monarchy and monarchy politics. This is a very blunt assessment, in view of John Locke's political philosophy, which has inherited and developed the same social contract tradition, as being rated as the preconceived preconceived theory of 'liberal democracy.'. The author wants to show that Hopps was also a real ‘pro - ’ political thinker who tried to promote or pursue the ‘democracy ideology ’ of which the people are the main actors. The author admits that the origins of natural rights ideas and the idea of resistance to government, the development of the theory, and the development phases are being accepted as being the first conceived or proposed concept by Locke. In contrast, Hops is either read or misread as anti-democracy liberal thinkers who do not accept democratic resistance. In short, it summarizes the “people are absolutely subject to the monarchy” in terms of the word“resistance of government” in regard to Locke. In this case, the lack of preconceived ideas and the like, with regard to Hopps ’ philosophy, have corrected the twists and mispronouncements and revealed the full nature of Hobbes' political philosophy. The founder of natural rights?

Korean title: 홉스의 리바이어던

Korean author: 선우현

Korean publisher: EBS BOOKS

ISBN-13: 9788954778282