Reviews
A few years ago, when I read Mythology and Psychoanalysis, what I first saw was so exciting that I became interested in other myths, and it led to psychoanalystology. I was asked what had changed from this version of the revised version, and so I re-saleed it in a short summary of my feelings: "Sluo; it seems like the first book I read was a "Door";. And so, it's because of changes in the content and composition of the book, but I personally think it'll be interesting to read it again, because
Lee Chang-jae: Myth and Psychoanalysis
Fascinating stories, numerous symbols, immortal beings, heroes who face harsh fates. The myth that has provided humanity with the most undying imagination for thousands of years is still the best text to show the irony of living, understanding human nature. Myth and psychoanalysis: The invention of psychoanasts is a book that has renewed and interpreted the major myths of peoples around the world as a way of psycho-analystizing. Authors use Freud, Jung, and modern psychoanalysis to show the essence of the ‘psychological Mythology’ that touches the hearts of human mind by unmasking the symbols contained in the 20th pages of Sumerian, Korean, Chinese, Chinese and Japanese, Egypt, Greece, Northern European mythology and heroic myths. It also provides a more formal understanding of the meaning and value of mythology by a colorful approach that goes beyond psychoanalysis, humanology and folk science. The tools of psychoanalysis to interpret and understand mythology are “a remarkable event that is interacting with the underlying unconscious in our mind and is now ‘here’”. It offers a chance to experience more vividly the myths of human desires and emotions thousands of years ago, deep-wounded wounds and traces of disaster, multiple messages that should be kept in mind for survival.
Korean title: 신화와 정신분석
Korean author: 이창재
Korean publisher: 아를
ISBN-13: 9791198070654
Reviews
A few years ago, when I read Mythology and Psychoanalysis, what I first saw was so exciting that I became interested in other myths, and it led to psychoanalystology. I was asked what had changed from this version of the revised version, and so I re-saleed it in a short summary of my feelings: "Sluo; it seems like the first book I read was a "Door";. And so, it's because of changes in the content and composition of the book, but I personally think it'll be interesting to read it again, because
