G. E. Moore: Principles of Ethics

Moore's scruple-rated principles of ethics are widely known in philosophical history as the ephemeral of analytics. What is the nature of the ethical principles, and are they being evaluated as a result of the analytics? In the first sentence of the book's statement, in which it reveals its purpose in writing, we find the primary answer. As in all other fields of philosophy, I think that the difficulty and disconsistency that are filling the ethical profession is largely due to a very simple cause. That is, the reason why you want to answer is because you try to answer the question without first correctly explaining what the question is. Using logic error, Moore's point is that the ethical quest has been one word of the "mistake of scare-a-tudy attacks". In other words, since he tried to answer the question by throwing the wrong question and then asking the wrong one, the ethical inquiry has to be said that it is in the wrong direction. So what is the essential question of ethics that we really need to ask? Moore makes a big distinction between ethical questions. One is: “What kind of object must exist for itself? The other is: “What kind of action should we do? “I’m sorry,” he said. The electron is not just about something else, but about what it's about, we can say it'll be about the original value or the original line.

Korean title: 윤리학 원리

Korean author: G. E. 무어

Korean publisher: 아카넷

ISBN-13: 9788957335956