It's the work of Rene Girreer, who solved the anthropological notion of more than a copy of the nature of war that is no longer understood by Enlightenment or liberalism. I remind you again of the nature of the war that's going on.

War is no longer an extension of politics. Gererr reveals that man is a desire for other people's desires and sees how imitation desire, competition, and sacrifice mechanisms create and repeat the structure of violence. After the collapse of sacrifice, we are a philosophical reverberation of what ethics should be lived.

America and China, Russia and Ukraine, Israel and Hamas. Even in our present lives, war continues without letup. In fact, our country is not far from the word war. When you think of the situation as a truce with North Korea, it's not strange when there will be another war. So why doesn't war stop? I asked him that question and read this book. Based on the Klautitz < war theory, which is called the classic, Rene Girr tried to add his views and explain why. The modern view of war based on Gerr's

We live in an age of extremes. The late 20th century thinkers who have lived through the fall of the rational decision, the false end of ethnic satellite, are asking questions about the ‘ reason ’ in which Enlightenment is not trusted. One of them is a anthropologist who gave a new view of the structure of reason itself. Are we really active? "Not so" is the uniform exposé, and the philosopher. The charges of intelligence seem to be a task that must be ‘ held up ’ as if from the Netzsche line.

It's a war theory book, but it's so bold that you can read without basic knowledge. Rene Girer, who is a war-causer, has been very understanding when he explains the details of the chapter. The new view of Rene Girrman is a fun and much to think about.

“We will destroy and love each other. As Gerr says, we are the ones who have become only extreme choices. History has given me a lot of thought as I read humanely about the war theory of insight into this generation and the world's wars. Maybe people are getting the same stupid. I think, "What? I heard it. We have a desire to be like each other, and we're so close, that conflicts arise, and war breaks out. We have to move, not take our place. It's hard to be wise.

It's a bold book, but it's felt from the reader that a professor is going to be asking questions, discussing them, and doing them in a kind of lecture that will be answered. A rich explanation, especially early on, helps us to understand the significance of war between nations through the theory of imitation and competition between individuals. This is not as easy to read as it is to ask for the will to understand the nature and meaning of war and its historical background. Yet, the new concept

The book, which begins with the description of the imitation reason for Rene Girre, reinterprets Claubitz's war theory based on the concept of René Gerr. In front of the book, there was a brief introduction of the prior knowledge needed before reading the book with different materials, which I liked to leave the access barrier low and turn it on to reading. Why wars still last, and what is the end of the extremes? What is needed in modern society to challenge this extreme violence? It is a book

Human violence will eventually lead to a apocalypse destruction, a book with a heavy diagnosis of Gerar. Girer notes that among the concepts of Klaubitz war theory, "the end of the war is to go to extremes.". The idea of copying this side to win the war is that it eventually gets to extremes. This is still a valid point when we talk about the nature of war today. A war that doesn't give a stop. Someone who lives in the face of extreme violence. But the boldness of Gerir and Chantres does not