Reviews
I wanted to know what knowledge is, but I learned very clearly how much we know, how far reason lies on a fragile foundation. We don't remember all the knowledge and we make mistakes in remembering the knowledge we remember and mistaking it for something else. A more common mistake is to think that you know something you don't know. Yet Plato asked: ‘ What is knowledge? To answer that, I thought philosophers like Decart, Spinoza, Kant, Hegel, Bitgenstein, Hydiger, Whitehead had answered the
A long, long commentary on the work. I don't know, but I see a passion for the reader.
You can see the midwifery of Socrates on the subject of the cognitive theory of Plato.
There was a reason for the low review. It's hard. But he also gave me 870 of these weights to make this bruise understand. I look at the discussion of knowledge and I reflect on how futile I have studied and taught. I'm going to look at the moon, not my fingers, as it did in the caption, but I've been ashamed to look and laugh at my fingers.
Platon: Theaetetus
Günthe Iitettosung is one of the most profound cognitive texts in human history and is a notorious conversation to be made. This conversation is based on the question: What is knowledge? ‘ I am a book, ’ he said, ‘ that is the most explicit and single subject in Plato's dialogue in this respect. But Gönthe Iitetossang is notorious for his deep and profound feelings. For example, 19th-century British thinker John Stuart Mill complained that he could not understand Plato's quaytétossion even though he had been trained intelligently from childhood through his dialogue. But Götte Iitetossang is worth the challenge. It is not too much to say that there are no books in the book, which are unique in the diversity and keenness of discussion and in the context of creativity, which stimulates reader's endless imagination. The position of researchers on Günthe Iitetosang has been, for example, extreme. And this interpretation of the bridge is what makes Plato different. In that sense, a reader who dreams of the overall understanding of Plato's philosophy must read the Günthe Ithetosin. The discussion of Günthe Iitetossung is based on midwifery, which makes it difficult to follow from the outside. But it is also a work of deep insight, like a well that is long and long and never dried up by such a method of discussion. In 2013, the first edition was published, corrected and revised into possible misogynistic translations, and released in ten years as a former cancer-old general, Plato.
Korean title: 테아이테토스
Korean author: 플라톤
Korean publisher: 아카넷
ISBN-13: 9788957337813
Reviews
I wanted to know what knowledge is, but I learned very clearly how much we know, how far reason lies on a fragile foundation. We don't remember all the knowledge and we make mistakes in remembering the knowledge we remember and mistaking it for something else. A more common mistake is to think that you know something you don't know. Yet Plato asked: ‘ What is knowledge? To answer that, I thought philosophers like Decart, Spinoza, Kant, Hegel, Bitgenstein, Hydiger, Whitehead had answered the
A long, long commentary on the work. I don't know, but I see a passion for the reader.
You can see the midwifery of Socrates on the subject of the cognitive theory of Plato.
There was a reason for the low review. It's hard. But he also gave me 870 of these weights to make this bruise understand. I look at the discussion of knowledge and I reflect on how futile I have studied and taught. I'm going to look at the moon, not my fingers, as it did in the caption, but I've been ashamed to look and laugh at my fingers.
