Reviews
The results of a survey by Japanese lawyers on the subject of media and court rulings in Japan, along with decisions and stories of victims in Korea, reflect the possibility of reconciliation between South Korea and Japan with the case of peace between the Chinese drafters and the Japanese domestics. Of course, what should be first is the fact that the perpetrators are acknowledging and an apology, but if the victims are alive and there is a small effect of reconciliation, then we can put down
Japanese lawyers look at each other and understand the difference in interpretations of understanding history and offer new insights to resolve the problem of Korean forced-to-be reconciliation and Japanese military comfort.
⠀ * A review that qualified to write a journal. For me, the book was very significant with the 76th anniversary of this festival of photoplum, which was usually devalued and highly critical of Japanese past perception and attitude. First of all, I was really surprised by the author’s Japanese lawyer, Uchida Matosí, and was shocked at the new knowledge as I read detailed laws and historical material. Japan has forced Chinese to serve as a forced sentence, and the author suggests what is
Masatoshi Uchida: Question of the Forced Laborer
Japanese error in the issue of forced-in-laws and a practical solution to the recovery of victims' rights were asked:. It is written by Uchida Masatoshi, a lawyer who is called the ‘ consciencey Japanese intellectuals ’ and who acts constantly in terms of completing his daily colonial remains and taking responsibility for war. The author says that the one-station agreement (one-on-one) and the billing treaty signed in 1965 was a re-examination agreement. Also, as the Japanese government of the past acknowledged, the treaty on compensation for forced victims in a one-time bill agreement was only about ‘the giving up of diplomatic custody ’ between countries and says that individual claims are a living right. What makes the book different from any other book on mobilization is that Japan claims to be able to use Chinese forces to solve compensation problems for victims in South Korea. The Uchida Matoshi lawyer was a prominent debater in "Chinese Forces to Avoid" and wrote the book based on his own experience. In the end of the book, Korean Newlight scholars have criticized false claims made about forced victims in the '50s of tribalism':. The author also poured out his special affection for the articles and reinforced new material that he could not see in the Japanese language. Many of the quotations from Japan on the 'Synods' reality of the day will enhance the interest and understanding of Korean readers. The translator of the book, Han Seung Jo, and a writer and author, should not lose sight of the ‘speech's words ’ written by the author.
Korean title: 강제징용자의 질문
Korean author: 우치다 마사토시
Korean publisher: 한겨레출판
ISBN-13: 9791160406276
Reviews
The results of a survey by Japanese lawyers on the subject of media and court rulings in Japan, along with decisions and stories of victims in Korea, reflect the possibility of reconciliation between South Korea and Japan with the case of peace between the Chinese drafters and the Japanese domestics. Of course, what should be first is the fact that the perpetrators are acknowledging and an apology, but if the victims are alive and there is a small effect of reconciliation, then we can put down
Japanese lawyers look at each other and understand the difference in interpretations of understanding history and offer new insights to resolve the problem of Korean forced-to-be reconciliation and Japanese military comfort.
⠀ * A review that qualified to write a journal. For me, the book was very significant with the 76th anniversary of this festival of photoplum, which was usually devalued and highly critical of Japanese past perception and attitude. First of all, I was really surprised by the author’s Japanese lawyer, Uchida Matosí, and was shocked at the new knowledge as I read detailed laws and historical material. Japan has forced Chinese to serve as a forced sentence, and the author suggests what is
