Reviews
It was good to know about the history of ancient Near East. But, it's a little bit of a shame to translate. So, for example, 528. The 531 calendar is not translated at all, it's only in English.
I'm very proud of the expertise that has been studied and written down in the history of ancient Orient.
It's a little disappointing to find out that the revised version is a misprogrammed or simple ota, which is a very early invention. But for those of us who are not good enough English to get the originals, this is a great help. I think it's a Christian publication, so if you want to be a little bit out of my way, you have to hand it over. -- -- -- 2. The 18 more pages passed, the less unified terms, frequent missigns and the more likely to be disappointed with the wording. Even though one of
Mark van de Mierup: Ancient Near Eastern history
The book’s third edition of the ancient Near East provides a comprehensive consideration of an unusual pluralist culture in the ancient modern Near East. This book, which provides a complex history of the region in a simple and accessible way, is based on B. C. It covers the origins of the first cities in Mesopotamia, the growth of the Babylonian and the Hittite kingdoms, and the rise of the Assyrian and Persian empires. In conclusion, it described the changes in ancient Near East before Alexander's conquest and added new themes to the domination and continuation of the region during the Persian Empire. Other latest items include a series of complex events, 30 new images, political events, military expeditions, and social cultural developments that have occurred in the Near East over a period of more than 3,000 years.
Korean title: 고대 근동 역사
Korean author: 마르크 반 드 미에룹
Korean publisher: CLC(기독교문서선교회)
ISBN-13: 9788934124825
Reviews
It was good to know about the history of ancient Near East. But, it's a little bit of a shame to translate. So, for example, 528. The 531 calendar is not translated at all, it's only in English.
I'm very proud of the expertise that has been studied and written down in the history of ancient Orient.
It's a little disappointing to find out that the revised version is a misprogrammed or simple ota, which is a very early invention. But for those of us who are not good enough English to get the originals, this is a great help. I think it's a Christian publication, so if you want to be a little bit out of my way, you have to hand it over. -- -- -- 2. The 18 more pages passed, the less unified terms, frequent missigns and the more likely to be disappointed with the wording. Even though one of
