Reviews
The basics of the book are the right words, but not the least of the author's arguments. Because the reader is a passive position that you can't talk to him about. Did all those people who recommended really look closely at the contents of the book? I'm tired of reading that obvious recommendation in the head of a book, frankly. It seems to me that as a concerned person, as a foreign-stationed person, we need a lot of discussions and interaction with the deep-intensive and relevant social
Korea, with a different perspective. A book that gives us a chance to look at ourselves outside in a new light. But a few chapters are more about Korea. The writer's personal opinion and the value that you're missing these days? I feel out of place about it. But that's also an interesting subject.
Lee Man-yeol: The Bigger Korea That Only Koreans Didn't Know
The author of the series has a special power. It is the capacity to bring and reproduce the potential of Korea. He is a persuasive spread of our Korean national hard and small power, which will be the envy of the world. In Korea, where South Koreans are not aware of it, and the possibility of Korea is re-enlightened in four years, Korea now has to tremble at geo-democracy and confidently declare its principles and beliefs about the world. He has been a foreign scholar in Korea for over 10 years. It is not easy to study and discover Korean vision and potential beyond understanding Korea. Yet he does not miss the great flow of South Korea and the painful inner world. And surprisingly, after the coal, we're offering you our assignments and our journeys. The book has been put together in different paths, and it's been tailored and polished for this time. This is also the intellectual narrative of a conscientious intelligence who has been constantly concerned about the future of Korea with his gentle love for Korea.
Korean title: 한국인만 몰랐던 더 큰 대한민국
Korean author: 이만열
Korean publisher: 레드우드
ISBN-13: 9791187705055
Reviews
The basics of the book are the right words, but not the least of the author's arguments. Because the reader is a passive position that you can't talk to him about. Did all those people who recommended really look closely at the contents of the book? I'm tired of reading that obvious recommendation in the head of a book, frankly. It seems to me that as a concerned person, as a foreign-stationed person, we need a lot of discussions and interaction with the deep-intensive and relevant social
Korea, with a different perspective. A book that gives us a chance to look at ourselves outside in a new light. But a few chapters are more about Korea. The writer's personal opinion and the value that you're missing these days? I feel out of place about it. But that's also an interesting subject.
