Lee Jae-ha: Aramaic Commentary on the Book of Revelation

"We have read Revelation in the last 2,000 years as a wrong text." - Second Revelation is a maze of books. The Latter of Revelation was read in the wrong text. The author, who received a wish-based version of Jün-Luh-Luq's John theology, notes that the original book of Revelation is written in Aramaic, not Hella, and claims to be fully able to understand the Bible when reading it in Aramaic. The history of the 2,000-year church raised no question that Hellah is the text of Revelation. But after 40 years of research in Revelation, the author rediscovers the way the modern church has dismissed the book of Revelation (the last thousand - thousand - year - long eschatological version) and finally publishes an commentary on the Aramaic book of the book. This is a book in the exclusive Aramaic book of Revelation. Although there is a study abroad in Aramaic about Revelation, the book of Revelation, but it is not comparable to the vastness and density of this comment. This is the first commentary on the Aramaic Revelation, which has never been published since the ancient church. It is of great historical significance that this writing was made not by Western scholars, such as German and English, but by Korean scholars. Syrian Christian in the power of Syria who succeeded Jesus in his gospel after the ascension of Jesus to the resurrection, has been plagiarized and returned with a tag of Eastern church on the back of history after the monotheism and the Nestorian debate. The Hella and Latin Bibles, which were the dominant members of the Church of Gidock, have been considered a text for all time in the Helra language Revelation of both the Catholic Church and the Protestant Church.

Korean title: 아람어 요한계시록 주석

Korean author: 이재하

Korean publisher: 요한신학연구소

ISBN-13: 9791198030597