Kim Mi-young: Eastern Thought in the Theory of Music in the Akhak Gwebeom 2580

The music has always been around people, as well as in the context of the traditional era's commentary on the 'Absolence' of First World History, which is written as a simple and detailed explanation. In ancient times, music served as a medium for connecting humans and gods. Today, music has a remarkable power to comfort and entertain people. So we're getting very close to music. And what's the comparison? A bad boy? The Iranian title does not come close. The concept and the Chinese have produced this kind of depth. It's a strange thing to say, because it's not what we're writing today. "Absoluteness is a word that corresponds to music today.". The culprit points to the meaning of the path and norms. The abuse of music is a book dealing with the norms of music. Does this book feel distant from the writer because of his concept and his Chinese? A villain? I'm writing in a context that would make it easy to comment on Volume 1. As the introduction shows, so does the writer? A villain? I felt a sense of well-being when I first came in and, over the years, could have solved my own well-knownness by wrestling with books. What about the writer? A villain? The book has been written in the hope that future readers who are interested in it or want to read it will not have similar experiences. A villain? Although it is a music science today, the real material is always associated with the edology and closely related to the quagmire. And it's not just modern music, but dance, theater and always a mass. So the mere release of the letters does not fully reveal the norms of the occult. This is not just an ancient reference, but an art history.

Korean title: 악학궤범 악론의 동양사상 2580

Korean author: 김미영

Korean publisher: 성균관대학교출판부

ISBN-13: 9791155503133