Reviews
You're right. You're ashamed. The whole book has been virtually unregulated and uncomplained. So when you describe a book or a technical term, there's a lot of suspicion about credibility. It's not that he argues directly, but it's just a claim and a re-conference of personal experience. Also, the general distinction is not clear, as it was later described in the explanation of the Adarma's formula, by introducing the idea of a euro-based torpedo. It's very unprofessional, and it feels like
The subject of the book is hard. The writing is getting so difficult, it's annoying to see one page. The fact that it was written on the monthly paper, it made me feel soft and had no hope of getting into my head.
Kang Myung-hee: Introduction to Buddhist Meditation
Various modern meditation methods are being used in many fields, including medical and sports, psychological counseling. The nature and development of this multiplicity of meditation methods, the development of the Buddhist meditation process, the reasons why it has developed, help us understand the right connection to fundamental nature. This gives you a sense of why you should always rely on the nature of enlightenment while meditating to get relief and help and comfort from immediate healing. We have introduced many phenomena that can be seen in the overall understanding of meditation and in the performance of meditation, so that it can be applied to actual meditation, based on the experience of meditation. In many of the daily scenes, he explained what meditation should be done and what it should be focused on. It can be a useful reference not only to the meditation worker but also to the meditator.
Korean title: 불교명상입문
Korean author: 강명희
Korean publisher: 담앤북스
ISBN-13: 9791162012765
Reviews
You're right. You're ashamed. The whole book has been virtually unregulated and uncomplained. So when you describe a book or a technical term, there's a lot of suspicion about credibility. It's not that he argues directly, but it's just a claim and a re-conference of personal experience. Also, the general distinction is not clear, as it was later described in the explanation of the Adarma's formula, by introducing the idea of a euro-based torpedo. It's very unprofessional, and it feels like
The subject of the book is hard. The writing is getting so difficult, it's annoying to see one page. The fact that it was written on the monthly paper, it made me feel soft and had no hope of getting into my head.
