# My position on the 21st century North Korean Classic is always a neat, upright position to kneel. Because I think there's nothing more important about sharing the wisdom of life with our insides in so many relationships, such as understanding of people and understanding of the world. The classic did not betray me, as it were. I don't think it was classical to turn around and end up in that place even when it felt like betrayal. I really meant reading that much, and I wanted to realize it. But

In fact, the classics are hard to read on their own when they're like me. I'm not sure if you can read it on your own, because it's very easy to read on your hands. P. The source of 293 studies is idleness, and rest. In fact, it's not "hardness" that is the root of learning. P. When you're in school like this, you forget to study, you don't forget to eat, you never know how to get old, you've got to be tired and tired, and you can't afford to relax and relax, so that's what it's like to be in

The most difficult part of the book, the classic and the most hated, is a book with self-sharing, which has a great deal of barriers to go through, and so many passages that are being read that have nod and indexed -- unfortunately, Erich Rom's "The Art of Love," which was ambitiously held in my drawers -- is "If we change ourselves, we will change ourselves and if we don't change ourselves we won't be able to change ourselves.". I'll live a life that I didn't intend to have. If you have no

“When you have a proper study and practice and balance of life, your goals in life, life's happiness, are filled.” P. 281 - The classic doesn't betray you, and it's a book that allows you to think about what is fundamentally studying, why you need it. Books are usually about the philosophical inspiration of human foreknowledge and learning by quoting the sentences of Western philosophers. I was personally interested in the philosophy of the day and I took classes, and it was a pleasure to see

The word ‘ classic ’ was supposed to be a difficult subject in the title of the book, but it was not hard to read. I've learned a lot of classics that I don't know about, and I think the great strength of this book is to teach from a variety of classic books. It was interesting that the teachings of each classic could be applied long enough to modern society. In this process, I remembered a holy book containing Buddhist teachings, such as law views. The book is recommended to people who are

It's a book that you're talking about, after you've taken a classic story or verse. I was worried about what it would be like if I didn't know much about Eastern or Western philosophy and I didn’t know how hard it was to have books so that readers could follow along, and hopefully you could understand the philosophy very easily and also you could see what was going on in your mind.

What do you think true study should be? The answer is, I think, five principles of middle-aged. It's the learning position we need to have now. I thought that I had never done anything of five principles: "to learn in a wide range of studies,"“to ask carefully, and humbly answer questions,” ‘ to think with thought, ’ ‘ to judge with lightness ’ (to discern what you learn by being critical), and ‘ to be devout ’ (which must be done). In the meantime I have not made an effort to make what I

When books that are good at sorting out old things get confused, they go to Esai to feel empathy. But sometimes we forget that someone's deep philosophical messages can be of greater help in getting to know and organize themselves. The book is fascinating to hear that the first time you hear a classic, you're going to get away with it. I could also feel the fascination that came with the science of classical art, which was almost uninhibited. It also gave him time to sort out how deep his life

I think it's a book that gives you the wisdom and enlightenment of life through the classics. It is a book I recommend to people who have a vague concern about reality, who feel that growth as adults is necessary.