Reviews
I doubt everyone would understand and review it properly. I'm interested in physics, but I haven't been able to explore it deeply, so I want to get in touch with the input information, and I have a hard time understanding it, except for some. It's just a description of the knowledge that was originally given to the person who knew it. It's easy to explain, but never easy to describe. If someone who doesn't like physics, it's going to be worse. And if you like physics, but you want to know more
I read the recommendation. I think science is cold and cold, but when I saw this kind of love-sympathetic note of the science that I was studying, it made me feel so warm that I could see the way scientists are doing it.
I recommend you read it.
Everything is good except for the title translated. To translate the title from the original to the physics point of view would have been better suited to the contents of the book than to the best perspective.
The title of the title is "The 19\c392ACS.". The confidence of translation that has so literaryly changed the title of the world in physics is a book that starts to read in mind what is it? I like the way you start with the basic physics and get it out of your mind.
I feel like a personal teacher who's been released in a spoken language. This teacher has a technique to teach you how to be very kind and clear and to build large skeletons in your head. All right!
And as someone else said, I remember a lot of philosophy. So physics and philosophy seem to have a lot of contact. I recommend that you read it with a light mind.
And as we expand our understanding, our understanding of ignorance grows.
Now we need to put physics in its basic form. All of the generations to come. It's going to be a philosophical foundation.
It's an overview of the overall state of physics. It's not about much, but the point is:. It's not as if the title of the book were right. I would recommend his previous book, life, standing on the border.
Jim Al-Khalili: How can you not love physics?
How can we not love physics? He is a science-communicator and professor of theoretical physics at the University of Surrey who links science with public and public. It's as if the scientist's uncle is telling his little niece that he has never seen before, and he's letting go of the physical world he've loved all his life. Professor Jim Alcalili, who was first in love with physics in his teens, asserts that there is no alternative to explaining the world without it. What about the world in which quantum physicists say that physics is the only way to understand it? The author uses no complex formulas or unintelligible technical terms, explaining how the ‘I love him ’ physics can identify the roots and principles of the world and where the latest physics has come to achieve its fulfillment. The three pillars of modern physics, quantum mechanics, relativity, thermodynamics, all the way to the theory of physics's achievement and integration and unity, but in a language that is easy for a loner to understand, and from its foundations it's a strange story for science. The beauty of physics, or science, as he says, is the fact that we believe that the truth can always be replaced by new experiments, and yet it continues to move forward. Let's listen to the author who introduces the true posture of science, the openness of knowledge, the willingness to test and move on with endless experiments.
Korean title: 어떻게 물리학을 사랑하지 않을 수 있을까?
Korean author: 짐 알칼릴리
Korean publisher: 윌북
ISBN-13: 9791155814673
Reviews
I doubt everyone would understand and review it properly. I'm interested in physics, but I haven't been able to explore it deeply, so I want to get in touch with the input information, and I have a hard time understanding it, except for some. It's just a description of the knowledge that was originally given to the person who knew it. It's easy to explain, but never easy to describe. If someone who doesn't like physics, it's going to be worse. And if you like physics, but you want to know more
I read the recommendation. I think science is cold and cold, but when I saw this kind of love-sympathetic note of the science that I was studying, it made me feel so warm that I could see the way scientists are doing it.
I recommend you read it.
Everything is good except for the title translated. To translate the title from the original to the physics point of view would have been better suited to the contents of the book than to the best perspective.
The title of the title is "The 19\c392ACS.". The confidence of translation that has so literaryly changed the title of the world in physics is a book that starts to read in mind what is it? I like the way you start with the basic physics and get it out of your mind.
I feel like a personal teacher who's been released in a spoken language. This teacher has a technique to teach you how to be very kind and clear and to build large skeletons in your head. All right!
And as someone else said, I remember a lot of philosophy. So physics and philosophy seem to have a lot of contact. I recommend that you read it with a light mind.
And as we expand our understanding, our understanding of ignorance grows.
Now we need to put physics in its basic form. All of the generations to come. It's going to be a philosophical foundation.
It's an overview of the overall state of physics. It's not about much, but the point is:. It's not as if the title of the book were right. I would recommend his previous book, life, standing on the border.
