Reviews
The translation is a mess, and the arbitrary paragraph structure and titles, completely unrelated to the original text, are utterly incomprehensible. I really don't know what this book is about. Please choose a different book.
It discusses the question of what action is from Sartre's unique perspective, addresses the issues of freedom and responsibility in relation to it, and plays a significant role as an explanatory text on existentialism by evaluating and clearly expressing its essence.
Sartre's writing was relatively easy to understand, but the essays included later require background knowledge. Existence precedes essence. Man is defined by action. Each individual has the responsibility to define man.
It was easier to read than I had feared. I understood it well, too. I think I could understand it even better if I reread only the parts I want to.
We all aspire to become something. If so, are we destined to be something? We are beings capable of becoming anything depending on our mindset. It seems that our movement and activity are accomplished through our limbs. However, what actually governs our actions depends on our state of mind. Therefore, the root of evil is our mind, and the root of good is also our mind. Consequently, we must strive to control our minds well. Controlling the mind is achieved through what we see, speak, and hear.
For the average human being living in the modern era, penetrating the very essence of life has already become a distant memory. Furthermore, even within the academic discipline of "philosophy," the concept of [unclear] in its truest sense seems to be gradually losing its luster (for example, the rise of postmodernism). This can be said to accurately reflect the characteristics of modern society as we stand on the cusp of the 21st century. However, it feels somewhat irresponsible to attribute
Jean-Paul Sartre: Existentialism is humanism.
Sartre, who advocates for thorough atheistic existentialism while emphasizing thorough humanistic existentialism. A book in which a philosopher emphasizing the ethics of social engagement asserts that existentialism is humanism. It is compiled around themes such as debate, rebellion and revolution, and existentialism as humanism.
Korean title: 실존주의는 휴머니즘이다
Korean author: 장 폴 사르트르
Korean publisher: 문예출판사
ISBN-13: 9788931000207
Reviews
The translation is a mess, and the arbitrary paragraph structure and titles, completely unrelated to the original text, are utterly incomprehensible. I really don't know what this book is about. Please choose a different book.
It discusses the question of what action is from Sartre's unique perspective, addresses the issues of freedom and responsibility in relation to it, and plays a significant role as an explanatory text on existentialism by evaluating and clearly expressing its essence.
Sartre's writing was relatively easy to understand, but the essays included later require background knowledge. Existence precedes essence. Man is defined by action. Each individual has the responsibility to define man.
It was easier to read than I had feared. I understood it well, too. I think I could understand it even better if I reread only the parts I want to.
We all aspire to become something. If so, are we destined to be something? We are beings capable of becoming anything depending on our mindset. It seems that our movement and activity are accomplished through our limbs. However, what actually governs our actions depends on our state of mind. Therefore, the root of evil is our mind, and the root of good is also our mind. Consequently, we must strive to control our minds well. Controlling the mind is achieved through what we see, speak, and hear.
For the average human being living in the modern era, penetrating the very essence of life has already become a distant memory. Furthermore, even within the academic discipline of "philosophy," the concept of [unclear] in its truest sense seems to be gradually losing its luster (for example, the rise of postmodernism). This can be said to accurately reflect the characteristics of modern society as we stand on the cusp of the 21st century. However, it feels somewhat irresponsible to attribute
