Reviews
Will the book's description of their efforts be closer to understanding Newton and Einstein's work before they understand their widely known achievements? It's a detailed explanation that, although we all know of these genius scientists, they are so powerful that ideas that are at some point not directly connected to their achievements. First of all, Newton's method of research shows that he did not hesitate to re-read books when they came up with unintelligible or unintuitive parts, thinking
The book, in its study of Newton and Einstein, who are called the leading geniuses of humanity, does not guarantee that they have a really great achievement and claims to have various abilities and qualities that can identify with critical understandings and individual facts of the theory that existed at the time. Because if you look closely at people who are good at studying and getting more and more capable, you've seen that they're working on their head with a steady, steady effort rather
Newton. Einstein. And I still think,. If only I hadn't missed the apple. I'm on it. Just... I'm just starting to see the grades. There's so much in science to memorize. If only I hadn't missed the apology. I wouldn't have been so much to memorize. That's a stupid idea, right? This book tells us about the creativity of geniuses that we don't know. I don't think we should think of that kind of stupid thing anymore. Mm-hmm.
Hong Seong-wook: Newton and Einstein: The Creativity of Geniuses We Didn't Know About
Korean title: 뉴턴과 아인슈타인 우리가 몰랐던 천재들의 창조성
Korean author: 홍성욱
Korean publisher: 창작과비평사
ISBN-13: 9788936412050
Reviews
Will the book's description of their efforts be closer to understanding Newton and Einstein's work before they understand their widely known achievements? It's a detailed explanation that, although we all know of these genius scientists, they are so powerful that ideas that are at some point not directly connected to their achievements. First of all, Newton's method of research shows that he did not hesitate to re-read books when they came up with unintelligible or unintuitive parts, thinking
The book, in its study of Newton and Einstein, who are called the leading geniuses of humanity, does not guarantee that they have a really great achievement and claims to have various abilities and qualities that can identify with critical understandings and individual facts of the theory that existed at the time. Because if you look closely at people who are good at studying and getting more and more capable, you've seen that they're working on their head with a steady, steady effort rather
Newton. Einstein. And I still think,. If only I hadn't missed the apple. I'm on it. Just... I'm just starting to see the grades. There's so much in science to memorize. If only I hadn't missed the apology. I wouldn't have been so much to memorize. That's a stupid idea, right? This book tells us about the creativity of geniuses that we don't know. I don't think we should think of that kind of stupid thing anymore. Mm-hmm.












