Reviews
Translation is very difficult. I was looking forward to this as a great book, and gradually a lot of Korean translations that I saw were not smooth and unintelligible, and I compared them with the English text of Hainen. There was a lot of error, and I missed the Korean writing. It's a very careful task of the idea, context and history of the other languages, which is not seen, and seemed to be translated without understanding enough. I hope this book, which is not very well known in
If it's difficult, it can be always hard and abstract, and if you understand it properly, it could be very useful. Writers link modern-day theories with modern-station theories and cultural theories of modernity, while discussing architecture and relating to architecture to the point of view. They evaluate architecture as a cultural structurer and claim to be capable of criticalizing on modernity, even when they see the major paradoxes inherent in modernism being implemented. The whole book is
Hilde Heynen: Architecture and Modernity
Sworn construction and Mohanda Tititung are books that have presented to the architectural students a discussion of critical theories. The sub-section of the Baltervenjamin, the Ernst Blogger, Theodore Dorno and Venice schools can be studied independently of purpose.
Korean title: 건축과 모더니티
Korean author: Hilde Heynen
Korean publisher: 스페이스타임(spacetime)
ISBN-13: 9788955922684
Reviews
Translation is very difficult. I was looking forward to this as a great book, and gradually a lot of Korean translations that I saw were not smooth and unintelligible, and I compared them with the English text of Hainen. There was a lot of error, and I missed the Korean writing. It's a very careful task of the idea, context and history of the other languages, which is not seen, and seemed to be translated without understanding enough. I hope this book, which is not very well known in
If it's difficult, it can be always hard and abstract, and if you understand it properly, it could be very useful. Writers link modern-day theories with modern-station theories and cultural theories of modernity, while discussing architecture and relating to architecture to the point of view. They evaluate architecture as a cultural structurer and claim to be capable of criticalizing on modernity, even when they see the major paradoxes inherent in modernism being implemented. The whole book is
