I've spent a lot of time with the edgy. It's hard to keep the material from going through the reading. And if only I had read it back in 2003,. I think about it.

As globalization progresses, the gap between the average person and the mainstream has grown so that wage earners, irrespective of their will, are gambling about corruption, the author of the situation is to guard against the power of the multinational enterprises that have led to the extinction of middle class and the power that governments have in support of him.

And like individuals, the country can be alienated from the environment in which this book is based, and the author says where does that power come from and for whom it's different?

It was a book that gave me a big ring when we had no objection to the globalization flower. It also gives me the realization that it's a big deal if we do not have globalization. I remember this book every time the new liberalism, the shadow of globalization, appeared. The mainstream. I've been more interested in European economists and authors since this book. The views that are so different from those in the United States.

I've seen news in Hong Kong about large-scale mob action by our own farmers. Not just the agriculturality, but the violence and hard-pressed incident that ended, I thought, ‘Why do they fly to the plane and humiliate the country? ’. But now, if you think about it, you realize it was a kick for their survival and the best. The most basic industries, such as agriculture, for human survival, are being trapped in globalization and lost their place in what we call the farming of developed countries.