Reviews
For one thing, I still feel like I have not escaped the binary thinking that Latour criticizes. Because when you hear of an act, you immediately think of a person. So, while it may be that Latour's attempt to include non-humans in the actors and his efforts to embrace them are intellectually understandable, deep empathy is hard to understand. When you hear this argument, it feels like you're exposed to a theory of mind that is morphed. According to the theory of mind deformation, there is a
It's a wonderful book to re-stuck Latour, with a very neat theorem, and re-intuitive it again.
Graham Harman: Monarch of the Network
Latour is the one that we can talk about a lot of complex technical objects, Aristotle's, and G. W. We provide tools for realism beyond the critical limits of his major descendants, such as Leibnitz. While these pre-realistic philosophers were so fascinated by the "nature" as the birthplace of real objects, they tend to celebrate machines, particularly human technologies, as objects that are made up of things as mere cults or individual sets. In other words, Latour provides hope for a vital remedy when we consider philosophical reality, which is that humans are increasingly forced to deal with objects like airplanes, super-computers, global climates, and so on. In this preface you made.
Korean title: 네트워크의 군주
Korean author: 그레이엄 하먼
Korean publisher: 갈무리
ISBN-13: 9788961952118
Reviews
For one thing, I still feel like I have not escaped the binary thinking that Latour criticizes. Because when you hear of an act, you immediately think of a person. So, while it may be that Latour's attempt to include non-humans in the actors and his efforts to embrace them are intellectually understandable, deep empathy is hard to understand. When you hear this argument, it feels like you're exposed to a theory of mind that is morphed. According to the theory of mind deformation, there is a
It's a wonderful book to re-stuck Latour, with a very neat theorem, and re-intuitive it again.
