Go Woo-jeong et al.: Life Science and Technology and Politics

Until artificial fertilization, test tube babies, genetic manipulation, and recent Christophers technology, biotech has been developing without knowing the end. As much as it was dealing with life, biotech has always been the subject of ethical and philosophical debate. Who, and how, will drive properly so that the fast-run biotech trains don't get off the ship? Science and politics are at odds. Some people here stress democratic principles, accountability, social agreements and place political roles in the context of science's objectivity, as well as its claim that science should be divided between science and politics. There is also the argument that quantum parts can be more complementary and technological experts than confrontations. How do we interact, especially with technology, with biology and politics? The political theory, the theory of life and politics, the issues, the political relationship with life technology, and the political connection, are the arguments that technology can bring from a political perspective. First, the first part takes a theoretical view of the relationship between biotech and politics. It's about the political philosophers Puco, Havermas, Sandel, and others who are introducing the pessimism and optimism of the development of bioscience and suggesting the need and direction of the policy of life. The ‘life’ that we see in the biopoliticals is brought to the point of human security, and it presents the potential and direction of biopolitical science as a complex association with economics, culture, environment, medical sciences, and so on. Part 2 deals with the issue of biotech and politics.

Korean title: 생명과학기술과 정치

Korean author: 고우정 외

Korean publisher: 푸른길

ISBN-13: 9788962919530