Reviews
This book provides an in-depth summary and understanding of the original text of *Theory of Justice*, and organizes it concisely for the readers. It was the most helpful to me.
I purchased this hoping it would help me understand and organize the translation of *Theory of Justice*. Thank you.
Rawls's *Theory of Justice* can be seen as a critique of utilitarian ethics. Through this work, political philosophy was able to re-emerge as ethics. However, *Theory of Justice*, based on Kantian individual reason, was criticized by communitarians including MacIntyre. Communitarians like MacIntyre criticize Rawls by arguing that real-world human beings are not isolated individuals. However, their points of view diverge slightly. This is because Rawls questions the foundation of the state's
F. Lovett: Introduction to Rawls' Theory of Justice
*An Introduction to Rawls's Theory of Justice* is a book that explains the masterpiece *A Theory of Justice* by American political philosopher John Rawls (1921–2002). Translated by Professor Yohan Kim of the Department of Philosophy at Chonbuk National University from *Rawls's A Theory of Justice* (2011), published by Continuum Press in the UK, the book explains key themes in detail to make it easy for readers encountering Rawls's *Theory of Justice* for the first time to understand.
Korean title: 롤스의 정의론 입문
Korean author: F. 러벳
Korean publisher: 서광사
ISBN-13: 9788930625555
Reviews
This book provides an in-depth summary and understanding of the original text of *Theory of Justice*, and organizes it concisely for the readers. It was the most helpful to me.
I purchased this hoping it would help me understand and organize the translation of *Theory of Justice*. Thank you.
Rawls's *Theory of Justice* can be seen as a critique of utilitarian ethics. Through this work, political philosophy was able to re-emerge as ethics. However, *Theory of Justice*, based on Kantian individual reason, was criticized by communitarians including MacIntyre. Communitarians like MacIntyre criticize Rawls by arguing that real-world human beings are not isolated individuals. However, their points of view diverge slightly. This is because Rawls questions the foundation of the state's
