Reviews
I bought it! I always put it in the long-term basket and couldn't afford it, but I'll see you later!
It's good. I think it's better to look at the original. It's not Papagic, it's like Google Translation. Because of the literal version, some sentences have to be read multiple times, put in alternative words and rethink them.
Although the details of the details and the descriptions of each project are clean, the comments on the detail are not comfortable with the comments.
Edgar Starck: Spatial and material details in Mies van der Rohe's architecture
In the days of architect Ludwig van Der Ro, one of the architects who built a huge influence on modern architecture. His respect for him as a great architect continues to grow today. But, compared to Miss's architectural achievements, I have thought that his architecture and the logic of his construction work are still part of the research. The architectural question of how his architecture and his architectural inspiration worked on each building project that was built through his design has constantly stimulated the writer who is overindulging it. Finally, I decided to share with my readers the story of Miss's quest for architecture. This is why the writer had to start this book. The originals are the result of a series of different architectural works designed by Miss Lee, who took 14 pieces of work to testify to his architecture and examined it in detail. Miss has been working on how to deal with space, materials and detail as she unearths her architecture. So, in the process of searching closely for Miss's view of architecture, it's a new interpretation of what we still don't know about Miss'. The original document contains a particularly worked 3D drawing with text content on each page. This is to understand Miss's architecture and to explain visually his concept of construction.
Korean title: 미스 반 데어 로에 건축의 공간 재료 디테일
Korean author: 에드가 스탁
Korean publisher: 엠지에이치북스
ISBN-13: 9791186655573
Reviews
I bought it! I always put it in the long-term basket and couldn't afford it, but I'll see you later!
It's good. I think it's better to look at the original. It's not Papagic, it's like Google Translation. Because of the literal version, some sentences have to be read multiple times, put in alternative words and rethink them.
Although the details of the details and the descriptions of each project are clean, the comments on the detail are not comfortable with the comments.
