Confucius: The Analects of Language

The article gave as detailed details of the linguistics that he wanted to know while studying the books of the arts, the authors and others. To make the translation valid, he centered on the Chinese Publications and tried to provide as much examples as possible. A lot of examples can give more explanation and persuasiveness. Now, we're stacking up data one by one, and we believe that if we accumulate time and data, we can give a linguisticly high description of the performance. A major feature of the book is the value of Korean translation by describing all the letters, including words. The commentary, which explains the use of all the letters in the language as it did in this book and gives a lot of examples, is difficult to find in South Korea and China. In fact, I think what the readers of Korean schools wanted most is not this. This book was mainly consulted by the Chinese Publications Library and explained its meaning, especially when it was based on a powerful Chinese bibliography, a great English dictionary. The main focus was on presenting differences and giving comments from three Chinese scholars, Kim's son (Taming 2017), Lee's ’ Dong'sung (2011), Kim’s Li-Kong'sok (208), four - and Chinese scholars, Jin-suk (2016), the Hat-Song (2009), and Yang-Jun (2006) three comments. Follow this book through the English reading and you will certainly improve your academic skills. The author, too, is building up new Korean texts facing them in that way. What has been taught in English for more than ten years is ‘ a clear relationship. ’.

Korean title: 언어논어

Korean author: 공자

Korean publisher: HUINE

ISBN-13: 9791159016820