Would there be any scholar who would come to the conclusion that the basics of this is colonialism and translate it properly and produce books? A book that gives a critical view of the history of the Northman.

It's good to see the natural stylus of the East Korean peoples and the delivery peoples. We don't even have to test our history, our own history, where colonialism is mainstream, and we're going to call it a prestige. You've written a lot of the tri-state records... and you've removed a 100-year history book from the descendants of the holy nation who denied the very roots of our country in early Chosun, calling it the Holy Land. A company member, a returner, gives a public office or award, and

It offers real knowledge of distorted Korean history.

We're going to have to learn to understand and recognize our superiors. It was a translation of the history book "Save History" from 1675. We have corrected our case by the use of 40 books, but we make clear how to recognize and understand our history through the 'Second History' of more than 300 years tied together.

We've been able to look at the folk history perceptions of the lates in our country, and we've found studies of the intellectuals of various fields, including the articles by Dr. Kim Seok-seok, president of the International Institute of Human History and the Ethnic Cultural Research Institute. And as we looked up, it was clear from feed that the high-end was a nation powerful enough to extend territory to the area's source, and also, based on the story of our own people as a great nation, who

We'll read more and more of the calm story, since we've been fortunate to have read books for our own sakes, and until recently.