Reviews
I can't tell whether the problem is the translation or the original, but awkward sentences keep cropping up. Perhaps that's why the author seems to ramble. (That often happens with translations of academic works: the translator doesn't know what they're translating.) The original title is Flaws of Nature. Explaining it with technical knowledge also makes parts of the book tedious. Reviews saying it's engrossing or recommending it to young children are clearly book advertisements. I should have
I've become interested in biology, and this was an engaging read.
Flaws of Nature: The title itself caught my eye, but the phrase “Whales Don't Breathe in Water” was even more compelling. I was surprised by something so familiar that I had never even wondered about it: Why can't whales breathe in water? Doesn't evolution move in a better direction? I had assumed it did, but I was amazed to learn that nature can evolve in ways that are inconvenient and cumbersome, even to the point of threatening an organism's life. This is the author's first book, but as a
This book raises new questions about conventional evolutionary theory. It was so interesting and captivating that I don't think there was a dull moment as I read it. Haha. I liked that it covers so many stories, and in the end it also reflects on life through the lens of evolution, giving me a lot to think about. For that reason, I want to recommend it to everyone. 😊
At first, the section was unfamiliar to me and felt a little dull. But when I read it in comparison with people, I found it so interesting that I finished the book in a day. I recommend it! New facts alongside what I already knew made the book fascinating.
I enjoyed reading about the evolution of life through a variety of living things.
It gave me time to turn over the life we've been given in my mind once again. The discussion of human evolution—how far it may continue and how it might end—was an interesting, worthwhile prompt that let me glimpse the author's perspective.
Since learning about Darwin's theory of evolution, I've had many questions about life science and evolution. What attracted me to this book was the idea that evolution in nature is less stable than we think, and that it happened amid instability. The book has 10 chapters: 1. Die or Go Hungry; 2. What Flew Out of the Cuckoo's Nest; 3. Free Riders; 4. Beautiful and Cursed; 5. The Fate of the Seventh Tooth; 6. Extreme Altruism; 7. Cruel Compromise; 8. Evolution Trapped; 9. A Pretty Good Weakness;
Between four and a half and four billion years ago, molecules with unusual properties appeared. All they did was make copies of themselves, producing descendants; they are called replicators. If the first replicator had copied itself perfectly, and each copy had in turn produced another perfect copy forever, there would have been only one type of replicator. With no variation, there would naturally have been no growing complexity either. What actually happened was errors, the diversity that
The title alone made me curious. I expected a story unraveling nature's mysteries, but it's a book about evolution in nature. It's similar to The Red Queen. It's about evolution, yet oddly philosophical. I haven't finished it because of the review deadline, but I think its message is about looking at imperfection. I recommend it to anyone who enjoyed The Red Queen.
Andy Dobson: Whales do not breathe underwater.
Evolution proceeds through natural selection, in which genetic mutations useful to each generation are favored in the competition to survive and reproduce. Through this process, birds, bats, and dragonflies came to fly; snakes gave up their limbs; electric eels developed the ability to generate powerful electricity; and ants became farmers, cultivating fungi and aphids. The diversity and ingenuity of life produced by evolution, and the spectacle it creates, are truly wondrous and magnificent. But that is not all there is to evolution. Countless things in nature live in ways that are deeply irrational and inefficient: whales that live in water yet are constantly at risk of drowning; great tits that fail to recognize cuckoo chicks and raise them instead; elephants that, once their sixth set of teeth wears down, grow no more and starve to death; male swordtails that carry life-threateningly long tails to attract females; worker ants that bite their own daughters and render them infertile; and ground squirrels that call out as soon as they spot a predator, even though they know they will be the first to die. Countless organisms exist in forms that are far from perfect, flawed in one way or another. All of this is evolution, but it is hardly a collection of great successes. Even so, why have these creatures survived until now? In his first book, The Whale Doesn’t Breathe in Water (original title: Flaws of Nature), Britain’s next-generation biologist Andy Dobson explores strange evolutionary flaws found in nature, moving across ecology and paleontology, sexual selection, and genetics in a lively and fascinating narrative.
Korean title: 고래는 물에서 숨 쉬지 않는다
Korean author: 앤디 돕슨
Korean publisher: 포레스트북스
ISBN-13: 9791193506530
Reviews
I can't tell whether the problem is the translation or the original, but awkward sentences keep cropping up. Perhaps that's why the author seems to ramble. (That often happens with translations of academic works: the translator doesn't know what they're translating.) The original title is Flaws of Nature. Explaining it with technical knowledge also makes parts of the book tedious. Reviews saying it's engrossing or recommending it to young children are clearly book advertisements. I should have
I've become interested in biology, and this was an engaging read.
Flaws of Nature: The title itself caught my eye, but the phrase “Whales Don't Breathe in Water” was even more compelling. I was surprised by something so familiar that I had never even wondered about it: Why can't whales breathe in water? Doesn't evolution move in a better direction? I had assumed it did, but I was amazed to learn that nature can evolve in ways that are inconvenient and cumbersome, even to the point of threatening an organism's life. This is the author's first book, but as a
This book raises new questions about conventional evolutionary theory. It was so interesting and captivating that I don't think there was a dull moment as I read it. Haha. I liked that it covers so many stories, and in the end it also reflects on life through the lens of evolution, giving me a lot to think about. For that reason, I want to recommend it to everyone. 😊
At first, the section was unfamiliar to me and felt a little dull. But when I read it in comparison with people, I found it so interesting that I finished the book in a day. I recommend it! New facts alongside what I already knew made the book fascinating.
I enjoyed reading about the evolution of life through a variety of living things.
It gave me time to turn over the life we've been given in my mind once again. The discussion of human evolution—how far it may continue and how it might end—was an interesting, worthwhile prompt that let me glimpse the author's perspective.
Since learning about Darwin's theory of evolution, I've had many questions about life science and evolution. What attracted me to this book was the idea that evolution in nature is less stable than we think, and that it happened amid instability. The book has 10 chapters: 1. Die or Go Hungry; 2. What Flew Out of the Cuckoo's Nest; 3. Free Riders; 4. Beautiful and Cursed; 5. The Fate of the Seventh Tooth; 6. Extreme Altruism; 7. Cruel Compromise; 8. Evolution Trapped; 9. A Pretty Good Weakness;
Between four and a half and four billion years ago, molecules with unusual properties appeared. All they did was make copies of themselves, producing descendants; they are called replicators. If the first replicator had copied itself perfectly, and each copy had in turn produced another perfect copy forever, there would have been only one type of replicator. With no variation, there would naturally have been no growing complexity either. What actually happened was errors, the diversity that
The title alone made me curious. I expected a story unraveling nature's mysteries, but it's a book about evolution in nature. It's similar to The Red Queen. It's about evolution, yet oddly philosophical. I haven't finished it because of the review deadline, but I think its message is about looking at imperfection. I recommend it to anyone who enjoyed The Red Queen.












